@article{Markevicius_Cincikas_Porvaneckas_Stankevicius_Navikas_Andriukaitis_Sipylaite_Svediene_Uvarovas_Satkauskas_Kvederas_Valinevicius_Zilys_Andrijauskas_2016, title={Revised Evaluation of Hemodilution Response in the Semi-Closed Loop Infusion System}, volume={22}, url={https://eejournal.ktu.lt/index.php/elt/article/view/12826}, DOI={10.5755/j01.eee.22.1.12826}, abstractNote={<p> </p><p class="Abstract">A mini volume loading test (mVLT) method is used for decision making in our prototype semi-closed loop infusion system (SCLIS). The mVLT fluid protocol consists of hemodilution response-guided mini fluid challenges. Each mini fluid challenge (MFC) consists of a 2.5 ml kg<sup>-1</sup>–5 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> crystalloid bolus infused over 2 min–5 min and followed by a 5 min period with no fluids. Arterial plasma dilution efficacy (aPDE) of a MFC is calculated from invasively measured hemoglobin (aHb) before and after each MFC. Capillary plasma dilution efficacy (<em>cPDE</em>) is calculated from non-invasively measured hemoglobin (SpHb). The zero or negative arterio-capillary plasmadilution efficacy difference (<em>acPED</em> ≤ 0 p.d.u.) is an indication of <em>hemodilution non-response</em> and <em>imminent edema</em>. However, it requires both invasive and non-invasive hemoglobin measurements. A non-invasive assessment of hemodilution response within the mVLT method would increase its practical application and reduce costs further enhancing its applicability in the SCLIS. This possibility exists if the <em>cPDE</em> could reliably predict the <em>acPED</em> value or the hemodilution <em>response</em> (the presence of <em>acPED</em> within a range of &gt; 0) or <em>non-response</em> (<em>acPED</em> ≤ 0).</p> <p class="Abstract">We report a retrospective observational study in an elective total knee arthoplasty (TKA) setting. The 2.5 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> boluses were used in six MFCs in both pre- and post-operative mVLT sessions. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of <em>cPDE</em> in predicting the hemodilution <em>response</em> using the <em>receiver operating characteristic</em> (ROC) curve and <em>gray zone</em> approaches. Our secondary objective was to investigate the feasibility of a statistical optimization method (SOM) in predicting the <em>acPED</em>.</p> <p class="Abstract">The analysis included 480 paired values of <em>cPDE</em> and <em>acPED</em>. The best cut-off value for <em>cPDE</em> was 0.015 p.d.u. (specificity = 0.84, sensitivity = 0.90). The <em>gray zone</em> identified a range of <em>cPDE</em> values between 0.013 and 0.028 (p.d.u.) for which the hemodilution response could not be indicated reliably. The 14 % of the <em>cPDE</em> values were in this range.</p> <p class="Abstract">The non-invasive evaluation of hemodilution response is acceptably accurate in the perioperative TKA setting. The mVLT algorithm within our prototype SCLIS was upgraded by implementing the results of the present study.</p><p>DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.22.1.12826">http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.22.1.12826</a></p>}, number={1}, journal={Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika}, author={Markevicius, Vytautas and Cincikas, Darius and Porvaneckas, Narunas and Stankevicius, Edgaras and Navikas, Dangirutis and Andriukaitis, Darius and Sipylaite, Jurate and Svediene, Saule and Uvarovas, Valentinas and Satkauskas, Igoris and Kvederas, Giedrius and Valinevicius, Algimantas and Zilys, Mindaugas and Andrijauskas, Audrius}, year={2016}, month={Feb.}, pages={57-63} }